Lacero
Mar 17, 02:59 AM
Is is an on-focus mouse-over effect coupled with an animated gif, as to how they achieve the magnification effect within the browser? Or is it Dynamic HTML or some new-fangled technology only created within Google?
SilvorX
Sep 22, 02:43 PM
Originally posted by MacCoaster
Hah, seriously? Interesting...
mhmm, probably trying to give whistler-blackcomb the attention for the 2010 winter games i guess...
Rated,cute love oekaki has
of love you wallpapers,
This is the eautiful love is
iPhone Lovers Wallpapers
Beautiful photography
Echi Wallpaper, Beautiful and
eautiful love wallpapers
FREE LOVE WALLPAPERS including
i love you quotes wallpapers
Lovers at freepink glitter
Beautiful wallpaper named
iPhone 4 Minimalist Wallpapers
High resolution 3d wallpaper
Hah, seriously? Interesting...
mhmm, probably trying to give whistler-blackcomb the attention for the 2010 winter games i guess...
Dreadnought
Mar 24, 02:01 PM
How could those PS3 have such high numbers. They only have 3.2 Ghz Cell processor in them. 3.2 is pretty fast, but it is a Cell proc. Did someone forget to divide it through a 1000?!?
PretendPCuser
Sep 11, 10:42 PM
Quark is in the belly of the beast. I haven't used ID (Yet) but i do have to say, Quark does seem a little long in the tooth, on it's last legs for years. Now to scrounge up all the loose change to see if i can sport a new G4...
ThePreacherMan
Nov 9, 11:27 AM
Does it work with the mini Ipod? Would like to know how useful it would be for the Mini Ipod Owners.
mikes63737
Apr 3, 03:12 PM
Definately not.
Windows XP is one of the most overpriced crappy operating systems I have used. $300 to install XP Pro? Tiger is $130!!! And it actually works!
I was reading this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_vista) and I saw that Windows Vista won't include the Aero transparency unless you buy one of the "Professional" packages.
Activation sucks.
Windows Installer barely works... half the time it would get to 97% and just stop.
Network Neighborhood (or whatever its called now) freezes everytime you click "View Workgroup Computers".
Confuses people and eventually it all comes to me. I am definately the smartest computer user in my school (after the IT guy who is never there) and all I hear is "Mike whered i save my project", "mike why is word taking so long to load?"
Edit: Forgot to say that it crashes all the time.
In conclusion, they suck, we haven't been hard enough on them, and their suckiness makes more work for everyone else.
Windows XP is one of the most overpriced crappy operating systems I have used. $300 to install XP Pro? Tiger is $130!!! And it actually works!
I was reading this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_vista) and I saw that Windows Vista won't include the Aero transparency unless you buy one of the "Professional" packages.
Activation sucks.
Windows Installer barely works... half the time it would get to 97% and just stop.
Network Neighborhood (or whatever its called now) freezes everytime you click "View Workgroup Computers".
Confuses people and eventually it all comes to me. I am definately the smartest computer user in my school (after the IT guy who is never there) and all I hear is "Mike whered i save my project", "mike why is word taking so long to load?"
Edit: Forgot to say that it crashes all the time.
In conclusion, they suck, we haven't been hard enough on them, and their suckiness makes more work for everyone else.
michaelrjohnson
Feb 29, 07:20 PM
i suppose that i do the same thing. but i guess that i spend most of my time reading the threads, then, by the time i'm done reading the whole dang thing, i have nothing to say that hasn't been said! (ah well) i'm chugging along at a meager 200some posts, but i'll be at 500 this calendar year... i promise!
Dagless
Mar 16, 05:54 PM
Faux News?
Either way, I'm off to fill my 1 hour a day addiction of Half Life 2 Deathmatch :D
Either way, I'm off to fill my 1 hour a day addiction of Half Life 2 Deathmatch :D
Sun Baked
Aug 27, 01:18 AM
5. is BS, the new power supply has 400 watts - 40 more than the last model.
There are also two more drives to support, another optical drive, and increases in bus & processor speeds (yes this takes more watts).
Doesn't sound like overkill to me.
XRaid was pre-announced during the introduction of the XServe, everyone has just been waiting for Apple to officially intro the Raid drive holder.
There are also two more drives to support, another optical drive, and increases in bus & processor speeds (yes this takes more watts).
Doesn't sound like overkill to me.
XRaid was pre-announced during the introduction of the XServe, everyone has just been waiting for Apple to officially intro the Raid drive holder.
Cooknn
Mar 22, 07:16 PM
Is it possible to use a Bluetooth Apple Keyboard with the PS3?
King Cobra
Oct 23, 07:55 PM
>(MacUser1) I'd like a 17" (or 19") widescreen, with a GeForce 4 MX or an ATI RADEON 9000, 256 - 512 MB RAM, 60, 80 or 100 GB HD, faster SuperDrive and speeds ranging from 867 MHz, 933 MHz and hopefully, 1 GHz :D
I would too, but you will not see that with an iMac anytime soon. Those would be very well fitting specs for our current PowerMacs, except they have dual processors. :)
I think the one thing that is a real stretch would be the 100GB Hard Drive. The only reason Apple would something that high is an updated PowerMac carries more significant specs.
The 19 inch model has been rumored many times before, yet I find the need to surpass the current 17 inch model insufficient, given that the iMac is for the avg. Mac user and the PowerMacs are Pro model machines, for the Pro users. They have more options, so they buy something to perfect their needs. Plus, they have the option to buy a 17 inch monitor already. Why include a 19 inch monitor on an iMac, an avg. user's machine, when a Pro user may only need a 4x3 res. monitor and ridiculously fast speeds?
Expanding further, I estimate that a 19 inch monitor on the iMac would alone cost at least $1000, especially with the quality Apple uses. And no base model of the iMac has never cost more than double that, as far as my knowledge provides. In that case, if a real powerful iMac with the given specs is made, it will cost more than the base dual processor PowerMacs, especially if you purchased the now discontinued 15 inch monitor or a cheap ext. monitor. So it won't happen.
I would too, but you will not see that with an iMac anytime soon. Those would be very well fitting specs for our current PowerMacs, except they have dual processors. :)
I think the one thing that is a real stretch would be the 100GB Hard Drive. The only reason Apple would something that high is an updated PowerMac carries more significant specs.
The 19 inch model has been rumored many times before, yet I find the need to surpass the current 17 inch model insufficient, given that the iMac is for the avg. Mac user and the PowerMacs are Pro model machines, for the Pro users. They have more options, so they buy something to perfect their needs. Plus, they have the option to buy a 17 inch monitor already. Why include a 19 inch monitor on an iMac, an avg. user's machine, when a Pro user may only need a 4x3 res. monitor and ridiculously fast speeds?
Expanding further, I estimate that a 19 inch monitor on the iMac would alone cost at least $1000, especially with the quality Apple uses. And no base model of the iMac has never cost more than double that, as far as my knowledge provides. In that case, if a real powerful iMac with the given specs is made, it will cost more than the base dual processor PowerMacs, especially if you purchased the now discontinued 15 inch monitor or a cheap ext. monitor. So it won't happen.
wdlove
Feb 25, 02:13 PM
I use Safari exclusively, usually easier to stick with Apple. If Apple were to buy Firefox, then I could see switching. My wife downloaded Firefox because of login problems with Safari, but she still uses Safari more.
G99
Apr 29, 09:27 PM
This might not be the right forum, but, this really surprised me.
I was watching the 1984 Superbowl ad, and can swear I saw an iPod on the girl's belt!
I haven't reached any conclusions yet, but that really looks like an iPod:
46118
I was watching the 1984 Superbowl ad, and can swear I saw an iPod on the girl's belt!
I haven't reached any conclusions yet, but that really looks like an iPod:
46118
rice_web
Oct 26, 07:37 PM
I'm betting that we'll finally see updated iMacs. Although, my prediction is likely excessively optimistic:
- 867 and 1167MHz
- 133MHz System Bus
- 256MB and 512MB RAM
- Combo Drive and Superdrive
- All 17" Displays
Yet, the math of my prediction proves that an update of this likeness isn't impossible.
700 to 867MHz = 20% increase
800 to 1167 = 32% increase
This would not be--by any means--the largest increase in speed known to an Apple computer. Besides, if the PowerMac line is moving to 1000-1500, a 1.1GHz iMac may not be far off.
- 867 and 1167MHz
- 133MHz System Bus
- 256MB and 512MB RAM
- Combo Drive and Superdrive
- All 17" Displays
Yet, the math of my prediction proves that an update of this likeness isn't impossible.
700 to 867MHz = 20% increase
800 to 1167 = 32% increase
This would not be--by any means--the largest increase in speed known to an Apple computer. Besides, if the PowerMac line is moving to 1000-1500, a 1.1GHz iMac may not be far off.
AlBDamned
Jun 26, 04:02 PM
Here's an article that describes research into factory conditions throughout the computer industry:
eautiful world wallpapers
Very eautiful wallpaper.
Very eautiful wallpaper.
Red and Black Wallpaper for PSP. Description: Valentines Day anniversary acquired abundant acceptance during the Middle Ages. Lovers began to bless the day
Peace
Jun 20, 02:47 PM
AppleInsider is down.
BenderBot1138
Oct 28, 02:48 AM
Hey c'mon, there's exactly no more heat on a Powerbook than on any other Computer. Yes, you can feel thermal properties on a 1 inch thin computer (1 inch includes the flip up display by the way).
I use a PB 800 MHz - 60 GB - with 1 GB RAM. Yes I feel thermal properties but it is nothing to worry about at all. If your totally stressed about some people complaining about an electronic device displaying thermal properties, take Apple's word for it and don't listen; or take my word that these people are the same people who complain that their fridge is warm on top, or that the water tastes funny.
After hours of use, or after leaving it on for days and days, I can fold the PB up into sleep mode and put it in my Brenthaven Titanium 1 carrying case along with my Canon Optura 200 MC DV Camcorder and all the chargers, batteries, and cords that connect them and the total weight is just about 10 lbs (around 4.5 Kg metric).
I used to use a PC, but beleive you me, now I think they're PP. My name is BenderBot1138 and I'm very cool using my Powerbook. :D
I use a PB 800 MHz - 60 GB - with 1 GB RAM. Yes I feel thermal properties but it is nothing to worry about at all. If your totally stressed about some people complaining about an electronic device displaying thermal properties, take Apple's word for it and don't listen; or take my word that these people are the same people who complain that their fridge is warm on top, or that the water tastes funny.
After hours of use, or after leaving it on for days and days, I can fold the PB up into sleep mode and put it in my Brenthaven Titanium 1 carrying case along with my Canon Optura 200 MC DV Camcorder and all the chargers, batteries, and cords that connect them and the total weight is just about 10 lbs (around 4.5 Kg metric).
I used to use a PC, but beleive you me, now I think they're PP. My name is BenderBot1138 and I'm very cool using my Powerbook. :D
looklost
Mar 16, 02:10 PM
Where is it? Dead link. Did they take it down?
EricNau
Apr 28, 01:23 AM
Ever try and get a new AIM buddy name? Almost every combination you can think of that would make sense to others has been taken, so people make crazier and crazier names or just add random digits.
Thank God I picked mine up in 1997. :)
Thank God I picked mine up in 1997. :)
Dr. Dastardly
Sep 2, 03:00 PM
First I thought you said 1 million POSTS.
Talk about spam. :p
Congrats though, thats an amazing number.
Talk about spam. :p
Congrats though, thats an amazing number.
MacRumorUser
Mar 20, 03:05 PM
you can do that with your PS3 ;)
I know ;) :D But with 60gb HDD - I doubt I'll ever have to.
I know ;) :D But with 60gb HDD - I doubt I'll ever have to.
MacBandit
Oct 6, 01:31 AM
Originally posted by bartonab
I too have a 867 Dual PowerMac and the Gforce4 card is "okay." I say okay because of the slow down in games because of either the 32MB of RAM on the card or the fact that Mac games "STILL" depend on the processor for painting rather than using the memory on the Video Card. I would wait for newer games to come out that use the video memory and certainly upgrade to something more than 32MB of ram. Especially if you are like me and want to play your games in the default resolution for your monitor of 1280x1024x32. Hope that helps.
Whether or not a game is CPU dependent is not based on the Apple at all but totally based on the software developer and how the create the game. Unreal Tournament is a perfect example of a CPU dependent game and it is CPU dependant on the Mac and the PC.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Stike
I have a GeForce 4 MX, by default, and the 4MX has 64 MB RAM not 32 as stated above. For the latest games its quite good:
Warcraft3: 1280 res all details: great!
UT: even 1600 res all details is still cool, but resolution overkill IMHO
Q3: 1280 all details: couldnt be much better
Black&White: 1024 all details: does its job really good. Dont know if UT2003 will still be good with that card, but it should.
Yeah, the PC has games as dogs have fleas, but to the Mac come only the cream of the crop games
I dont even miss CS...!
The original GF4MX that came on the mac was 64MB the one currently shipping in the new DDR Macs is 32MB.
I don't feel this is a great loss for this card because it has no hardware T&L. Also on the new DDR macs the card can access the ram in the machine at full speed bypassing the bus in what Apple calls DMA or Direct Memmory Access. This in a since gives the G4MX as much ram as the system can give at nearly the same speed as it's on board memory.
I know my Dual/Ghz/DDR machine with a Gig of ram and the G4MX has no problems with any game I run on it at 1280x1024 max everything. It runs between 60-80FPS with those settings in heavy action.
I too have a 867 Dual PowerMac and the Gforce4 card is "okay." I say okay because of the slow down in games because of either the 32MB of RAM on the card or the fact that Mac games "STILL" depend on the processor for painting rather than using the memory on the Video Card. I would wait for newer games to come out that use the video memory and certainly upgrade to something more than 32MB of ram. Especially if you are like me and want to play your games in the default resolution for your monitor of 1280x1024x32. Hope that helps.
Whether or not a game is CPU dependent is not based on the Apple at all but totally based on the software developer and how the create the game. Unreal Tournament is a perfect example of a CPU dependent game and it is CPU dependant on the Mac and the PC.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Stike
I have a GeForce 4 MX, by default, and the 4MX has 64 MB RAM not 32 as stated above. For the latest games its quite good:
Warcraft3: 1280 res all details: great!
UT: even 1600 res all details is still cool, but resolution overkill IMHO
Q3: 1280 all details: couldnt be much better
Black&White: 1024 all details: does its job really good. Dont know if UT2003 will still be good with that card, but it should.
Yeah, the PC has games as dogs have fleas, but to the Mac come only the cream of the crop games
I dont even miss CS...!
The original GF4MX that came on the mac was 64MB the one currently shipping in the new DDR Macs is 32MB.
I don't feel this is a great loss for this card because it has no hardware T&L. Also on the new DDR macs the card can access the ram in the machine at full speed bypassing the bus in what Apple calls DMA or Direct Memmory Access. This in a since gives the G4MX as much ram as the system can give at nearly the same speed as it's on board memory.
I know my Dual/Ghz/DDR machine with a Gig of ram and the G4MX has no problems with any game I run on it at 1280x1024 max everything. It runs between 60-80FPS with those settings in heavy action.
funkywhat2
Sep 30, 10:23 PM
Originally posted by crassusad44
there was a PowerBook 2400, only sold in Japan. It was Apples last stab at a Duo, and probably came with external floppy and optical drive. No G3 I know of have shipped with any kind of drive externally to my knowledge. Let's hope the new PB G4 will not be the first model to break this tradition since 1996/7...
your right, i found it at everymac.
http://everymac.com/systems/apple/powerbook/stats/mac_powerbook2400c_240.html
there was a PowerBook 2400, only sold in Japan. It was Apples last stab at a Duo, and probably came with external floppy and optical drive. No G3 I know of have shipped with any kind of drive externally to my knowledge. Let's hope the new PB G4 will not be the first model to break this tradition since 1996/7...
your right, i found it at everymac.
http://everymac.com/systems/apple/powerbook/stats/mac_powerbook2400c_240.html
XNine
Mar 29, 11:00 PM
Anybody here ever set up a MythTV (basically, a homebrew Tivo)?
If so, what Linux did you use, and what hardware?
I'm looking at building one and selling my ReplayTv. Probably an AMD 1.8 GHz processor, 1 Gig of Ram, 100 Gig HD, and not sure of which TV cards and case yet...
Since I'm not fond of Linux (all of the installation and compiling BS) I was thinking of use KnoppMyth (basically, Knoppix(?) Linux with the MythTV installer that is painless to install on the system)
If so, what Linux did you use, and what hardware?
I'm looking at building one and selling my ReplayTv. Probably an AMD 1.8 GHz processor, 1 Gig of Ram, 100 Gig HD, and not sure of which TV cards and case yet...
Since I'm not fond of Linux (all of the installation and compiling BS) I was thinking of use KnoppMyth (basically, Knoppix(?) Linux with the MythTV installer that is painless to install on the system)