Saturday, May 7, 2011

free wallpaper pics

free wallpaper pics. newest Free wallpapers of
  • newest Free wallpapers of



  • ddtlm
    Oct 26, 02:08 PM
    bousozoku:

    At least in the case of "3D games" and "3D" there will no immediate use for a 64-bit processor, since the G4, G3, and everything else already supports 64-bit floating point numbers. The PPC-970 does have much better units to handle the "doubles" though, so thats certainly good.





    free wallpaper pics. free-wallpaper-1367
  • free-wallpaper-1367



  • Gus
    Feb 18, 08:34 PM
    If I remember correctly, wasn't AlphaTech a huge hater of the PDA threads? I seem to remember getting flamed quite a bit in those type of threads. I never understood why they were so disgruntled, and now I am the same as they were. HeHe.

    Regards,
    Gus





    free wallpaper pics. Digital free wallpaper
  • Digital free wallpaper



  • void
    Sep 15, 10:28 PM
    If apple really did make an iPhone, it would be either chrome-ish silver (Pro-Line), or White and chrome (Consumer-Line). Graphite is dead and has been since quicksilver.





    free wallpaper pics. Free Wallpaper Radar
  • Free Wallpaper Radar



  • yellow
    May 26, 01:37 PM
    Well I for one think that Myspace is amazing. Its a great way to keep in touch with all my friends outside of school, and plus its something to do if your bored.

    And you were born in 1992. :)

    It definitely has more appeal to a younger audience. My 14 year old neice can't get enough of it.





    free wallpaper pics. Free Wallpaper Images
  • Free Wallpaper Images



  • Rocketman
    Oct 17, 08:30 AM
    Originally posted by MacCoaster
    Why before? Do you realize the PowerPC 970 is planned to start being produced (as in final RTM) in Q3/Q4 2003. They need to produce a lot of chips and many of those fail to meet tests so not all of them produce at a 100% rate. At any rate, Apple won't get enough of those until late Q4 or so to start assembling the new Macs.

    This has always interested me. It seems that even though Apple only has about a 3% market share there is always a perceived or real shortage of chips for their computers. This indicates they are employing JIT methods on the limited supply of chips that do exist and often get bitten by it.

    But it also means the fabs they use are a very small fraction of the volume of the pee cee marketplace. Probably even smaller in relative terms.

    It is my understanding the PowerPC itself had higher yield per wafer and higher % yield, so that is not the issue.

    It may be that because they are behind in the Mhz race they are trying to use chips closer to the technical limit of the process than Intel has to and thus there is a lower yield because of that.

    The fact there is a 700mhz chip in Apples premiere product this year supports that theory.

    Rocketman





    free wallpaper pics. Free Wallpaper Download
  • Free Wallpaper Download



  • 2nyRiggz
    Mar 25, 09:43 AM
    Good S*** I like to hear

    Dude, how did you do it...PM me or AIM.


    Bless





    free wallpaper pics. halloween wallpaper, free
  • halloween wallpaper, free



  • cjc343
    May 24, 07:19 PM
    I hate MySpace with a passion, and no, I don't have one. I considered putting a redirect in /etc/hosts to redirect all myspace pages to 127.0.0.1 but then I decided that having "myspace" saved anywhere on my hard drive would cause me emotional pain and I couldn't do it. Besides, I'm the only one who uses this computer and I have no interest in visiting MySpace.





    free wallpaper pics. Search Free Wallpapers
  • Search Free Wallpapers



  • UnixMac
    Oct 11, 10:35 AM
    Chad,

    Your signoff, "Rush uses a Mac"

    Are you referring to Geddy, Niel, and Alex?

    I didn't know that, if you are.





    free wallpaper pics. Free Wallpapers and
  • Free Wallpapers and



  • matticus008
    Mar 21, 02:45 AM
    Where are you seeing a difference between digital copyrights and any other kind of copyright in U.S. law? There is no such difference, and current law and current case law says that purchases of copyrighted works are in fact purchases. They are not licenses.

    They are purchases of usage rights, not of ownership of the intellectual property contained therein. Review the cases more carefully. If you don't want to call it a license, fine. But it's not ownership of the song. It's ownership of your limited-use copy of that song.


    No, you've got it in reverse. The Supreme Court of the United States specifically said that anything not disallowed is allowed. That was (among other places) the betamax case that I referenced.

    You seem to be conflating the DMCA with copyright. The DMCA is not about copyright. It's about breaking digital restrictions. The DMCA did not turn purchases into licenses. Things that were purchases before the DMCA are still purchases today.
    Yes, the Supreme Court said that, but in reference to all laws, not just copyright laws. Anything not forbidden by law is permissable. What this does is break other laws, as well as the distribution component of the copyright law. The DMCA is about digital copyright law, whether it has other purposes or not. It governs your rights with regard to copyrighted digital works. Your purchase of the CD did not and still does not give you ownership of the digital content of that CD, only ownership of the physical disc itself.



    This is a poor analogy. The real analogy would be that you have purchased the car, but now law requires that you not open the door without permission from the manufacturer.

    When you rent a car, the rental agency can at any time require that you return the car and stop using it. The iTunes music store has no right to do this. CD manufacturers have no right to do this.

    Not true. If you misuse your copy of any copyrighted work, you can be required to surrender your copy of the work and desist immediately. The law does not require you to do anything special with material you OWN. But you don't own the music. The analogy stands.


    Music purchases were purchases before the DMCA and they are purchases after the DMCA. There are more restrictions after the DMCA, but the restrictions are placed on the locks, not on what is behind the locks. The music that you bought is still yours; but you aren't allowed to open the locks.
    Exactly right about the restrictions placed on the locks, but exactly wrong about the content behind them. You did not own it before the DMCA, and you do not own it now.


    Your analogy with "so that anyone can use it" also misrepresents the DMCA: the better analogy is that you can't even open the locks so that *you* can use it.
    No, not at all. The DMCA has issues that need to be addressed, but it does not prohibit your fair use of material.


    In the sense that you have described it above, books are digital. Books can be copied with no loss and then the original sold. Books are, according to the Supreme Court, purchases, not licenses. Book manufacturers are not even allowed to place EULAs on their books and pretend that it is a license. There is no different law about music. It's all copyright.
    Again, read the court cases more carefully. You have rights to do as you please with the physical book. You do not have rights to the content of the books. You never did, and the Supreme Court has never granted you this permission. With your digital file, there is nothing physical that you own and control, only the intellectual property which is owned SOLELY by the copyright holder. Books are purchases of a physical, bound paper product containing the intellectual property of another individual. The Supreme Court has supported this since the implementation of IP law in the 19th century.


    Are you claiming that playing my CDs on my iPod is illegal? The file has been modified in ways that it was not originally intended: they were uncompressed digital audio files meant for playback on a CD player. Now they're compressed digital audio played back on an iPod.
    It's not illegal by copyright law to put your unprotected music on an iPod. You are not modifying the intellectual property of the owner. You are taking it from what you own (the physical disc) and putting it on something else you own (the iPod hard disk).

    That is completely outside of what the manufacturer intended that I use that CD for. I don't believe that's illegal; the U.S. courts don't believe that it's illegal. Apple certainly doesn't believe that it's illegal. The RIAA would like it to be illegal but isn't arguing that any more. Do you believe that it is illegal?
    One more time. The copyright law governs the material, your purchase covers the disc. You can do whatever you want with the disc, but you don't have the same freedom with the data on that disc. No one is stopping you from breaking the CD or selling it or doing whatever you want. You are not allowed to take control of the intellectual property that is not yours (the songs). Show ME a case that demonstrates otherwise from the past 50 years. Older cases are not applicable, and I'm being generous with the 50 year window as well given the wealth of more recent cases, all of which support IP rights and consumer ownership of the media but not the content.





    free wallpaper pics. Barros free wallpaper
  • Barros free wallpaper



  • bbarnhart
    Sep 18, 09:56 AM
    Originally posted by Pants


    most of apples money in the bank comes from stock selling and not profits on computers, hence theres a reason why its stock is a 'bargain'. As for products getting cheaper for a decade - well, true, but then so has the rest of teh market. Again, this has zip to do with apple as such.

    It is interesting to note that in the last reported quarter, Apple made a mere US$13 million selling computers and services. It also made US$26 million from interest (and other income). After a US$7 million tax payment, it netted its US$32 million. This has been the case for many previous quarters.

    Apple ain't getting rich selling machines.





    free wallpaper pics. some great free wallpaper
  • some great free wallpaper



  • SilvorX
    Sep 4, 10:54 PM
    ahhhh the good ol days of when osx was still in 10.0





    free wallpaper pics. free-wallpaper-nature-042
  • free-wallpaper-nature-042



  • trainguy77
    May 29, 10:15 PM
    You might want to use the script that way it starts on boot-up.





    free wallpaper pics. free wallpaper for computer
  • free wallpaper for computer



  • alex_ant
    Oct 11, 04:36 PM
    Javajedi, what you've done with your benchmarking is very helpful and I believe provides much insight. I too was surprised to see that the PowerPC performed as poorly as it did. Sorry if I missed you addressing this, but did you use GCC 3.x on the PPC?

    There are a few conclusions I could draw from this performance data:

    1) AltiVec acceleration is crucial to attain performance competitive with x86.
    2) In the best case, AltiVec-accelerated code will perform several times faster than optimized x86 code. However, the best case is very rare and limited to specialized tasks like BLAST, RC5, SETI, certain Photoshop filters, and so on.
    3) In the worst case, AltiVec-optimized code will perform barely any better or perhaps even worse than non-optimized code.
    4) The G4's integer and floating-point units are extremely weak.
    4a) Even MHz-for-MHz, they appear to be slower than those of the Pentium 4.
    4b) The 750FX's integer unit is stronger than the Pentium 4's clock-for-clock, but considering the Pentium 4 is clocked 4x higher at the moment, it does about 4x better overall.
    5) The c't SPEC benchmarks from a while back (the only source of G4 SPEC results I'm aware of) weren't that far off.

    I'm disappointed but not surprised to see that gopher has split from the thread. Oh well, I'm sure he'll reappear at a later date oblivious to everything that has just been presented in this thread.

    Alex





    free wallpaper pics. Free Wallpaper Downloads
  • Free Wallpaper Downloads



  • Moxiemike
    Sep 10, 02:15 PM
    Originally posted by loveshismac
    O man I hate Quark
    they must have gotten their interface design team from IBM's lotus notes.
    Plus 5 years before a major update and it still looks like the early 90's.

    I was formely trained for Quark, and since their was no compition until now, what else did u use?

    Once i used ID2, man it was like heaven. It imports quark files, works seamless with Photoshop and Illustrator, and has transparency, etc....

    I mean no more psd files tiff files and eps's.

    Just one psd, one illustrator file.

    Absolutly love it

    heers to the slow agonizing death of Quark

    and it fits seemlessly with OSX's pdf integration, and as such, makes a PDF workflow a snap. I've submitted press-quality ads frmo ID at least 5 times this week, with no problems

    It's great. And I control what they look like.





    free wallpaper pics. Free Megan Fox Wallpapers
  • Free Megan Fox Wallpapers



  • dongmin
    Oct 14, 11:43 AM
    well yes the story is on their site but it's an AP wire story. But you're right about the rumoring part. It's rather uncharacteristic of AP to make such a bold assertion when the only sources of info are 'industry insiders' spouting their guesses.





    free wallpaper pics. fairy fantasy free wallpaper,
  • fairy fantasy free wallpaper,



  • Thomas Veil
    Apr 4, 08:43 AM
    Before you say "bull----!", read this:







    free wallpaper pics. free wallpaper of sai baba
  • free wallpaper of sai baba



  • treblah
    Jun 22, 10:16 PM
    PB G5 rumor has been dead for soo long that i'm @ this point of PB G5 Rumors

    At this point, any asshat who posts "Powerbook G5 Next Tuesday!!!111one!!" should be banned for a week.

    It isn't a rumor anymore and the 'joke' is so lame. :rolleyes:





    free wallpaper pics. Free mobile wallpaper includes
  • Free mobile wallpaper includes



  • Johnny Rico
    Jun 16, 08:40 PM
    imovie has iphoto integration

    and video in itunes is terrible.





    free wallpaper pics. Balloons - Free Wallpaper
  • Balloons - Free Wallpaper



  • MacEffects
    Mar 28, 06:08 AM
    Okay, now this was the closest category I could find for this topic, but what I have to say must be said. My brother downloaded Kazza on my Dell Opitplex GX150 with Windows XP 256mb/20gig, the computer ran great until he did this. Now, I get major spyware, popups, spam, and a whole list of stuff, I can't even use it anymore it is slower then an LC III (really!), WTF are people downloading it for, you agree to have pop up's even when your computer is not on the internet and your browsers is quit, it seems like every 5 min large amounts of pop up's happen, and you can not use Kazza (A P2P network) with out allow it to happen, how do I get rid of all of that Kazza and junk it comes with?? I need help!





    iPoster
    Mar 29, 04:46 PM
    I have seen it mentioned by other folders, but I have no idea where to begin. I imagine it's similar to building a home server, but I have never done that before either.

    I'm asking because I have some old 'puter parts lying around doing nothing useful at the moment, that I thought I could build into something that would sit in a quiet corner of the house and fold.

    Any suggestions? :confused:





    MacBytes
    Nov 4, 02:06 PM
    Category: 3rd Party Software
    Link: Konfabulator for Windows - soon (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20041104150650)
    Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)

    Approved by Mudbug





    vniow
    Sep 11, 06:17 PM
    And you were wondering why you get thrashed and bashed with every thread you post.:rolleyes:





    BrittasMac
    Feb 14, 09:21 PM
    I thought it stood for demi-god vigilante posse gang?





    iGary
    Jun 2, 04:08 AM
    I did 440 points this week, but going to take a break for a couple of days. Go go Team M:) acRumors.