Sunday, May 8, 2011

desktop wallpaper icons

desktop wallpaper icons. wallpaper making desktop icon
  • wallpaper making desktop icon



  • Macky-Mac
    Mar 19, 04:59 PM
    ....What's so "unsucessful" about the "War on Terror" in Afghanistan?....

    it's still going on with no end in sight and at great expense to the tax payer....that's what you consider a success?

    You said;





    desktop wallpaper icons. Prey Logo Icon Wallpapers
  • Prey Logo Icon Wallpapers



  • whoooaaahhhh
    Jul 14, 09:54 AM
    Good post, sums up the current situation very nicely.

    Given that dual layer 50GB blu-ray discs cant even be produced yet, i think the 200GB claim is complete vaporware.

    I hope HD-DVD wins this war soon, as it is out of the gates first, and thus far a far superior format. If Blu-Ray were to give up now, i dont think many people would be sad. One format is better for everyone.



    NO.



    First of all, Blu-Ray discs are a completely new material and fabrication process, so highlighting the fact that they've only made 25GB discs (which were stable-ly created long before almost ANY HD-DVD's) and can't produce a disk which is far above the specs of the competition, is like saying screw the russians cuz they're space program hasn't sent a man to mars (nobody's done it yet, anyway). You can't blame Blu-Ray for not being able to deliver 50 GB yet, the meat of the war is just beginning anyway.

    Secondly, what was said about the VC-1 codec is very wrong. Microsoft's VC-1 codec is far worse and more difficult to work with than MPEG 2 or MPEG 4 that sony will probably offer in later versions of Blu-Ray. All this malarky about artifacts doesn't really make sense when you consider that we've been USING MPEG2 IN DVD'S FOR YEARS NOW! There's no way that the algorithim could be to blame for the artifacts! Sure it's fatter, but it's a lighter compression, and as Sony has shown with their PCM Audio on Blu-Ray, sometimes light compression on a bigger disk is better than heavy compression on smaller disks. It will be a lot easier to change to a more efficient codec down the line (which is what we've done with computers time and time again, as well as professional video) so we can get Ultra HD on Blu Ray when it comes out as well.

    I'm sorry, I understand people really want HD-DVD to win because it's easier and cheaper right now, but since when has the easiest option been the best? If Blu-Ray doesn't win this war we'll have another short life-span format, this version of HD will not be enough for the professional industry much longer, take it from a video guy. I've written a frickin' paper on this very subject.

    IMHO I'd like to see a Blu-Ray with the Mac Pro's to help solidify the consumer base into purchasing a better product, because that's how you standardize something in the market...sales...But I don't know that it will happen. Although remember DVD-RAM? Apple seemed to like that for awhile...that died...



    I also don't want microsoft handling my video codec, anybody remember the wonderous creation of WMV/WMA? The one that like none of us can use on macs? HD-DVD's codec is a derivation of the WMV-HD codec. Welcome to the Microsoft reality. They really like controlling proprietary codecs. Also...MPEG was created by a group of companies and people working together, Microsoft created WMV, so they've got almost complete say in how that plays out.





    desktop wallpaper icons. desktop icons on the shelf
  • desktop icons on the shelf



  • viewfly
    Sep 20, 07:17 PM
    I hold strong on my opinion of Consumer Reports too.

    I took their advice on the best vacuum cleaner to buy, some years ago.




    desktop wallpaper icons. desktop wallpaper and four
  • desktop wallpaper and four



  • wizard
    Mar 24, 01:58 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)

    I wonder if this may imply the coming of that unicorn rider we all know and love, the 'headless mac" (aka xMac).

    Removable drives, no screen, more powerful than an iMac, 1499.99.

    That is exactly what I'm thinking! Seriously there is no need for that many GPUs in the Pro and IMac requires a custom card. So where would all of these cards go - XMac is my guess.

    Or it could simply be a sign of a unified driver from AMD. That would make sense as it is a smarter approach than the highly targeted drivers of the past.





    desktop wallpaper icons. desktop wallpaper icons. more
  • desktop wallpaper icons. more



  • bobsentell
    May 2, 05:53 PM
    Man that Windows dialog is horrible. Why is there so much info? Are the file size and image dimensions influencing whether or not I want to delete it? And the classic Windows "Yes" and "No" buttons (instead of having something useful like Cancel and Delete. If that dialog pops up, you have to squint your eyes and look all over until you see "Delete ..." in the upper left corner, then take a second to make sure "Yes" actually means "Delete". And if you want to cancel, should you hit "No" or the X in the top right?

    Man, that OS X dialog IS NOTHING like that Aero dialog.

    Well, considering the dialog box says "Are you sure you want to delete xxxx?" I think a "Yes" or "No" are the best possible choices.





    desktop wallpaper icons. Per-Desktop Wallpaper Settings
  • Per-Desktop Wallpaper Settings



  • MacSA
    Aug 24, 05:59 PM
    Finally some Mac Mini rumours :D ..... lets hope this turns out to be correct. I wonder what specs we'll see in the next update, Surley no more Core Solo? :eek:

    The article mentions Core 2 Duo, but I bet they stick with Core Duo. everything else will be the same.





    desktop wallpaper icons. Select desktop wallpaper with
  • Select desktop wallpaper with



  • shawnce
    Jul 19, 08:19 PM
    The article posted:
    - Desktops: 614,000, down 14% from previous quarter
    - Portables: 498,000, up 60% from previous quarter

    I belive these numbers are for last quarter (note they don't add to 1.3M macs). They should post a correction.

    Yup... the correct numbers can be found in this PDF (http://images.apple.com/pr/pdf/q306data_sum.pdf) ... they should be 529,000 and 798,000 respectively.





    desktop wallpaper icons. bokke icon Desktop Wallpaper
  • bokke icon Desktop Wallpaper



  • macintel4me
    Sep 1, 03:29 PM
    Ignore the name Mac Pro, People I give you the 23" iMac!!!
    That is soooooooooooooooooooo beautiful!!!!
    Except you forgot the FrontRow IR port and that's at 30" and a 23" according to the description. :p





    desktop wallpaper icons. A Halloween desktop wallpaper
  • A Halloween desktop wallpaper



  • KnightWRX
    Apr 27, 10:06 AM
    Again, context is the difference. One wouldn't be in violation of the trademark if presenting it in general terms (outside of the field or in reference to something w/in the field, much like Windows OS vs. GUI windows),

    I think we're saying the same things, but perhaps my original post wasn't specific enough in verbiage....

    The bold part is wrong. In the field of reference, you can't use the trademark even if you're using it generically or descriptively if it has been granted. You will get sued and maybe even lose if the mark is not rescinded. You can even get sued preemptively as is the case here (Amazon appstore).

    Windows OS vs GUI windows is not the same field. One is an Operating System, the other is a GUI element of different computer systems. Microsoft never sued MIT over the X Window System because that's not an OS. They did sue the guys behind the Lindows OS though.





    desktop wallpaper icons. a new desktop wallpaper is
  • a new desktop wallpaper is



  • mrgreen4242
    Aug 31, 07:47 AM
    Yes I agree that is what you would expect as would I. But it doesn't work that way. They are more than likely to stay just where they are.

    Look at how old some of that stuff is from 2005 - a few even from 2004 - there and how they are still priced as if they hadn't long ago been replaced by more powerful models. Makes no sense. But there it is to study and see. :confused: :eek:

    They're still selling Quad G5's for $2799 which is rediculous.

    Er... The quad G5 isn't available new anymore, so it costs what it costs (there's nothing in the regular store to compare it to - the Mac Pro is NOT a one for one replacement)... IF this rumor is true, then the current lineup is just getting shuffled down with a new top end added, then they would have to drop refurb prices or it wouldn't make any sense.

    Now if they just shuffle the CPU down (so the base mini still has a Combo drive and 60gb HDD, but gets a 1.66 Core Duo) they will STILL have to drop the refurb price... A new regular price Solo with SD and 80gb HDD is currently $699, which is the current Core Duo refurb price.

    If they completely revamp the lineup then they may keep the same pricing, but seems highly unlikey as noone would buy them and keeping uneeded inventory on hand is bad business.





    desktop wallpaper icons. desktop wallpaper spring
  • desktop wallpaper spring



  • tjwaido
    Apr 27, 12:44 AM
    APPle Store - Oh, wait. Apple would probable sue themselves for infringing on Apple Store. Seems to be the trend.





    desktop wallpaper icons. Organize Your Desktop Icons
  • Organize Your Desktop Icons



  • CFreymarc
    Apr 2, 08:21 PM
    I really like this ad. Maybe this will be the new direction of Apple's marketing?

    Apple was one of the first to proclaim that technology is a means to your jobs and not the job itself. The world uses tools that engineers make for a purpose and not having the hotted box out there.

    To use the automotive analogy, we are out of the muscle car era and moving into a market where functionality overrides hardcore specs. This also makes the jobs of an engineer much more difficult since customer demands are now more intangible.





    desktop wallpaper icons. desktop wallpaper vector.
  • desktop wallpaper vector.



  • swingerofbirch
    Jul 19, 04:32 PM
    How could the analysts be off by almost a billion dollars? Are they held to account for this?





    desktop wallpaper icons. original desktop wallpaper
  • original desktop wallpaper



  • Henk Poley
    Mar 24, 02:34 PM
    Could somebody give an overview of the price and performance range of this list of cards? Just numbers is kind of opaque.





    desktop wallpaper icons. boring desktop wallpaper
  • boring desktop wallpaper



  • Apple OC
    Mar 20, 06:49 PM
    seems like they may be targeting Gaddafi now ...

    http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/20/libya.civil.war/index.html?hpt=T1&iref=BN1





    desktop wallpaper icons. boring desktop wallpaper
  • boring desktop wallpaper



  • Bertmg
    Mar 24, 10:47 AM
    I have way more than 50,000 songs, and even the worst of them is more necessary than your comment.

    Way too narrow minded to think that iPod is only used for music. It is a great place to back up movies and carry then around. not to mention it is an external hard drive!





    desktop wallpaper icons. of the desktop#39;s icon,
  • of the desktop#39;s icon,



  • 2ndPath
    Sep 1, 12:43 PM
    i don't think this rumor will come out to be true because this might take a lot of people from getting Mac Pro, unless this iMac comes out to be north of $2500, at which point nobody will buy this.

    I don't think an iMac with a larger Display is a competition for a Mac Pro. The biggest advantages of the Mac Pro are the expandability and the CPUs, which both put it into a completely different class than any iMac.





    desktop wallpaper icons. computer wallpaper Icons
  • computer wallpaper Icons



  • netdog
    Aug 25, 12:04 PM
    Why would updated mac minis be such a high security product. Its nothing revolutionary so why would apple want so much security on the shipping of them? Im hoping for something BIG

    Now you're talking. I want my iFon





    desktop wallpaper icons. Click on the Apple icon at the
  • Click on the Apple icon at the



  • relimw
    Sep 6, 08:51 AM
    Still cant see any sign of MBPs.*weeps*

    Maybe next tuesday...
    Dude, the MBP was updated in late April of this year, why would you think it'll be updated four and a half months later??





    Multimedia
    Aug 31, 12:32 PM
    What about this report of a silent mini update already in the pipeline on the French HardMac website? (http://www.hardmac.com/news/2006-08-31/#5869) :)

    "I have ordered a Mac mini Core solo with 1GB of RAM last Saturday to use it as a server, and what a surprise when I received the box!

    My Mac mini has been upgraded:
    - Core Duo 1.66GHz instead of Core Solo 1.5GHz
    - HD 100GB instead of 60GB
    - and a SuperDrive instead of a Combo!

    Thanks Apple !

    On the box, the specifications are those of a Mac mini Core Solo..."Wow! Fantastic for $599. Awesome! Exactly what I was hoping for - esp the 100GB HD. Looking great. I wonder why the Apple Website Store hasn't been updated to reflect this change? :confused: Surely all in the pipeline that were 1.5 solo are now 1.66 duo. Perhaps Apple doesn't want Joe Blow to know so the rest of the solos can GO with the Blows? :D

    That's gotta be the biggest increase in power in recent Apple history for no additional cost - twice the cores running faster than the previous one. Maybe back in the G4 days something like this happened. But it wasn't at the bottom of the line for $599. And it CERTAINLY wasn't unannounced and not even on the packaging!

    I'm very excited for all the mini buyers out there. Congrats if you get one like this before Apple admits they are in the pipeline.





    ipodG8TR
    Aug 16, 11:08 AM
    Both companies have cult-like followings (Apple and Stern, and let's face it, Stern is Sirius)

    Allow Sirius subscribers to get satellite radio on their ipods, maybe even download a limited portion to the HD.

    But the killer feature is the ability to BOOKMARK a song you like and buy it from iTunes later or over the air for those who want wireless.

    I already have a lifetime Sirius subscription as well as numerous Apple products including an ipod.

    PLEASE make it happen and don't let the Zune get this feature first.





    lynziwow
    Nov 25, 10:16 PM
    I'm a manager at an eyewear boutique. This is not Sunglasses Hut. We do not carry Oakley. We specialize in high-end, independent, mostly European designers that most people haven't heard of.

    $400 is average for a pair of frames. The average pair of rx glasses without insurance is between $700 and $900.

    I have never seen a case as intense as that gun case used to protect eyewear, ever! But don't take offense, each to his own.

    Just wanted to raise awareness to all these people stating that $200-$400 is "expensive" for eyewear when they are spending $$$$$$ on phones, computers, tvs, etc; which are probably replaced more frequently than the glasses which help them see and are the first accessory others see on them.

    Glasses should be as important of an investment as your fancy electronics.

    Check out these brands if you're interested: ic! Berlin, Face a Face, Orgreen, Bevel, undostrial, strada del sol, historie du voire, theo, and so many more.

    - eyewear nerd:cool:





    andiwm2003
    Nov 15, 10:44 AM
    is there a chance that they replace the two dual core xenon with only one quad core xenon in the mac pro and drop the price? speedwise it should be about the same and it should definately be cheaper to make.





    iEvolution
    Apr 26, 05:11 PM
    The term app has been used LONG before it became a popular term, all the way back in Windows 95 I remember the term app being used for applications on Windows.

    Ridiculous lawsuit is ridiculous. This kind of stuff makes Apple look petty, just like the youtube videos of antenna problems they had.